Immigrant Labor

Filipino Nurses, Healers in Trouble is a testament that no immigrant labor is above attack, no matter how privileged or educated. Under the guise of a nursing shortage, thousands of nurses and doctors have been brought into the U.S. to work as nurses. But when they speak up for their rights, which have been clearly and repeatedly violated, they are subject to attack just like everyone else.

In this case, twenty-seven nurses from the Philippines have been jerked around by the nursing homes who brought them over. Their green cards were delayed. Their initial wages were about a third of the promised rate, and even when they attained official status, they were often paid wages about two-thirds their promised and federally regulated rate. After saying enough is enough and complaining to their embassy, they decided to vote with their feet. In doing so, they were conscious about leaving at a time when there would be the least impact to the patients they cared for.

But the entire system is against them. Not only is the New York Times article on the attack, standing behind the nursing home corporations. Judges and senators are after them as well. These nurses were brought in because they're "honest, industrious and don’t complain a lot". That will be enforced by law, if need be.

Justice For Sale

Nice article on bail bondsman, an institution nearly unique to the United States: Illegal Globally, Bail for Profit Remains in U.S.. It runs down a brief history and the recent expansion of the bail industry, which is considered an obstruction of justice elsewhere. While touting the glories of capitalism, it clearly demonstrates the class nature of the justice system.

Take That

Some might remember the lawsuit on behalf of workers at IBM. They were in salaried positions and not given overtime pay despite all the overtime work they do. The trick was that in order to be in this category, one has to be categorized like management and these workers aren't.

So the lawsuit was "won" and now IBM has moved to cut the base pay of these computer technicians by 15% (IBM Cuts Technicians' Base Pay After Lawsuit). The company claims that workers will make up the difference through overtime pay. The only way to counter this kind of backhanded slap is through organizing.

Tapeworm in the Belly of the Working Class

Company unions were formally outlawed in the United States in 1935 with the National Labor Relations Act. But this is a legal formality, and today company unions are again a dominant force in oppressing the working class and preventing them from having their own, independent organizations. As long as this situation persists, workers cannot expect their lot to improve.

Ron Gettelfinger (head of the most important company union in the U.S. – if not the world) just spoke up after a long period of silence (UAW Sees Big 3 Saving $1,000 a Car). The silence was due to the nasty concession contract he forced upon autoworkers in the fall. The rank and file were riled up from that vote, so it was best to let that settle down before saying anything.

But time has passed, and Gettelfinger and the union brass have their loyalties. Now, he proudly brags about how he has single-handedly cut the standard of living for workers everywhere: "the union's new labor contract with Detroit's Big Three auto makers should save the trio about $1,000 a car built in the U.S." (Are car prices suddenly dropping by that much?) He is proud of having let GM cut its workforce, putting workers out of their jobs. And, of course, his "decent relationship" with Cerberus founder Stephen Feinberg means that workers at Chrysler can expect more attacks soon.

The large 'No' votes on the auto contracts didn't come out of nowhere. There are workers, including those who've already faced Delphi, willing to organize against the concessions. Statements like these from Gettelfinger make it clear that the struggle continues.

Don't Mind the Man Behind the Curtain

The class nature of the legal system is brought into stark relief in the case of Lockheed workers whose case has now be kiboshed: Conflict of interest tanks worker's case. The majority of judges on the California Supreme Court have stock in oil companies and thus had to recuse themselves from this case. The remaining judges, instead of bringing in temporary judges, decided not to hear it. Case closed, sorry about your medical bills, now go home and shut up.

Many are happy to provide solutions to this situation. The primary suggestion from analysts and editorialists is to have the judges keep their investments in a blind trust. In other words, to hide their wealth from them, but more importantly from the public. This doesn't change the fact that these judges are members of the elite, benefiting from the misery of workers like those at Lockheed. But it does have the effect of illusion, making it look like these judges are neutral. And in the end, this is what most interests the ruling class.

Priorities and Motives

Hanlon's Razor, or "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity", is perhaps the most insidious and disgusting excuse of our time. It proposes a dichotomy between conspiracy theory and buffoonery, when the reality is that neither is culpable. It allows people to dismiss, off-hand, others as "conspiracy theorists" while appealing to their own sense of intellectual superiority. A good economist will tell you to look at motive and incentives, and in turn this should be enough to understand most situations.

Los Angeles public transit is riddled with so many holes and inefficiencies that a common saying here is "there is no public transit". An article in the Daily Breeze explores one of those holes – a Green Line that stops two miles from LAX (The mystery of the Green Line).

Early on in the article, a former councilwoman is quoted paraphrasing Hanlon's Razor, thus setting the tone. Fortunately, the article goes on to show the motivated interests involved and why we still have no direct connection to the third busiest airport in the United States.

One guilty party is LAWA, whose own lack of interest in the project has most certainly contributed to it never getting off the ground. Nominally, they supported the LAX-Green Line link, but "the support didn't go very deep". Whether to attribute it to parking fees or property concerns, it is clear that their material interests have conflicted with building the link. LAWA is an entity large and important enough to pressure local government if they so wished.

The Transportation Commission must take the rest of the blame. Unfortunately, the article does not go into details about who was on the committee and what their own possible interests might have been. In any case, the panel's initial motive was to serve a larger business community (El Segundo, at that time), which already tells the reader that pandering to business was more important than public service. And, of course, since no one was willing to fight for more funds to serve both ends, the public still loses.

Welfare Mothers Make Better Lovers

Fascinating research article over at Japan Focus, Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan: Gender and Class Dimensions of Income and Employment. Apparently statistical analysis in Japan in about a century behind the rest of the industrialized world, as this study is the first to actually break out an analysis of single mothers.

Single mothers in Japan have the highest rate of workforce participation in the world (87%), yet struggle to make ends meet as the average salary is 2.2 million yen per year (c.f., 5.9 million for married fathers and 7.8 million when both parents work). The article explores the differences that come from the class of the mother, derived from their educational background. Overwhelmingly, single mothers in Japan are more likely to have less education, and in turn more difficulty getting a "permanent" position. This contradicts the "conventional wisdom" that divorce rates in Japan have been increasing as women become more educated and financially independent. On top of this, single mothers in Japan are much less likely to receive child-care assistance from relatives as compared to the U.S. and U.K. (only 12%).

The article points out one particularly interesting correlation that still needs to be studied. In Japan, the divorce rate and men's unemployment rate map quite closely. The chart is here: Trends in Japan's divorce rate and men's unemployment rate.

A notable aside from the article: the Japanese government does not maintain an official poverty rate. They maintain a count of the people who have received public assistance (生活保護 seikatsu hogo), but that statistic certainly leaves quite a few people falling between the cracks.